Friday, February 16, 2007

Spaces that invite Teaching for Understanding


I’ve been in Singapore for over a week now, since late on Thursday, February 8, and perhaps it’s not surprising that there has been hardly a moment to catch my breath, let alone time to post to this blog. Singapore is an incredibly well-organized, high energy, efficient place. Traffic flows freely for the most part, along roadways that are beautifully landscaped with green spaces that shade the highway with their canopy and provide natural purification of pollution. Cars are uniformly modern and pristine, which is the result of specific policies and customs, I have learned. The government limits the number of cars on the road by issuing a “Certificate of Entitlement” to car owners. The certificate expires after 10 years, so most owners scrap their car at that time, rather than pay the certificate fee for an old car. The price of the certificate floats, from around $5000 up to $10,000 or more Singapore dollars (which are worth about ¾ of a US dollar), depending on how much demand there is for the limited number of certificates issued in a year. In this way, the government limits the number of cars on the road, while levying a tax that I assume helps them maintain flawlessly smooth highways.

So here’s another car-based story about Singaporean efficiency. Almost all Singaporeans back into parking spaces, in contrast with most Americans who drive in front-first. The advantage of the former is that drivers can take their time backing into the parking space and then are in a position to see better when it comes time to exit. But might they not bump into the barrier or wall as they are backing up, you ask? No, because cars in Singapore are equipped with a little alarm that sounds when the back of their car comes within 10 cm of something behind it. Fewer dents, eh?

I’ve seen so many examples of this orderly approach to making life work right, but let me tell you about one that relates to Teaching for Understanding. Several schools in Singapore are integrating Teaching for Understanding throughout their organization. I’ll write more about their alternative and innovative approaches in another post, but here I want to describe how Victoria School has built support for TfU right into their architecture. The Principal Mr. Low Eng Teong and Vice Principal Mr. Adrian Lim (a graduate of GSE’s TIE program in 2002) applied for funds provided by the Singapore Ministry of Education to support schools in their efforts to enact the Ministry’s education policy called Teach Less Learn More. They proposed to remodel existing classrooms in ways that would invite teachers and students to use them for various kinds of performances and forms of interaction.

These school leaders, who are orchestrating the integration of TfU throughout Victoria School, met with teachers who used the TfU framework to talk about how they would like the walls, spaces, furniture to look and function to support their TfU activities. As Adrian says, “We wanted form to follow function.” The four classrooms that resulted are amazingly beautiful and the invitation to try new participation structures and modes of learning is built right into the environment. The wall between each classroom and the covered corridor next to it is now glass with a large door. Passersby can look in to see learning in action, and the class members can see outside to the school’s large eco-pond or go out to use the inviting table in the corridor.

Inside, the classrooms have varied kinds of furniture that invite creative uses. One room has tables with two bean-shaped, formica-covered surfaces that are hinged so they can accommodate from 4-8 people in varied relationships.
Another room has trapezoidal tables that look like a tangram puzzle and almost audibly asked to be combined in various patterns. Some walls are made of hinged storage units that can fold into the wall with a white-board surface showing. Or they can be opened up, revealing storage and seating space inside and creating a small nook where a group could talk without disturbing groups in the neighboring nooks.

Another classroom lends itself to presentations with a small raised platform in the middle to invite “culminating performances” for the whole class. This room also has curved tracks in the ceiling that allow soundproof curtains to close off three separate spaces where smaller groups might work to prepare a performance. The modular furniture in this performance space is also remarkably flexible. Each module has a bench that easily holds two people working on the table surface. The other side of the table has a back rest with a bench so that two more students could sit facing the same direction as their table mates to watch a performance on the raised stage. Or the second pair can turn around to work with their mates at the table.

Each of the spaces is the same size as the typical classroom in Singapore, but the invitation to invent, interact, recombine, and perform is so much more enticing than the typical single-desks-in-straight-rows configuration. As a bonus, the colors and surfaces are beautiful which stimulates a surprising sense of energy and well-being.

As soon as I saw these spaces, I thought of a paper written by my friend Kate Bielaczyc called Designing Social Infrastructure. Kate conducts design research on the uses of new technologies in schools. In this paper she describes a detailed framework for planning and analyzing how cultural beliefs, practices, socio-technical-spatial relations, and interactions with the “outside world” influence the use of educational technologies. Fortunately, Kate is now working at the National Institute of Education in Singapore and was able to come visit these great spaces at Victoria School designed to support Teaching for Understanding.

This story of envisioning, planning, and enacting a remarkable “form follows function” initiative is one of many innovative and complex school improvement strategies I’ve seen in this small but mighty city state. It illustrates the remarkable “can do” attitude that seems typical of many people I have met in Singapore, which is encouraged by a government with the means and inclination to invest in education.

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Teaching for Understanding in China


Landing in China from Bangalore, I realized what a jolt it is not to share a common language with one’s companions. English is commonly spoken in southern India, so I rarely needed a translator in Bangalore. In China, I have discovered that most young people know at least some English. Students in China (at least in the major cities) now start learning English in school as early as first grade. (Does this make you wonder how early most American students start learning Chinese or any other language besides English?) This policy is a relatively recent one, however. So many adults in China do not speak or understand English, including many people working at the front desk of my hotel in Shanghai, the travel agent at the hotel, all the taxi drivers I met, and many waiters in the restaurants I visited. Fortunately, most Chinese people are friendly, patient, and good at sign language. I was also lucky to find bilingual people at all the crucial junctures. Still, it is a struggle to communicate across a big language barrier. I sympathize more deeply than before with immigrants who are dumped into schools or other places without knowing the local language and must start from scratch trying to make sense and express themselves.


Teaching for Understanding as a Common Language:


Speaking of common languages, I found that Teaching for Understanding does indeed provide a wonderfully rich means of communication, even when it has to work across cultural and linguistic divides. The elements and terms of the framework supported some wonderful conversations with Chinese educators about what they have learned from their online courses with WIDE World, how this learning is affecting their teaching and their work with colleagues, and how it is benefiting their students.

A Lovely Lesson at Pingnan Primary School in Shanghai:

I had a very exciting visit with a fifth grade English teacher names Zhang Yurong (who told me her English name is Lucia) at the Pingnan Primary School. My visit was arranged by Vicky Wang, a professor at a teacher training school in Shanghai, who completed the Teaching for Understanding I course and the coach development course through WIDE World. Vicky had offered to take me to see a teacher apply what she learned from the TfU I course. Ms. Zhang was the teacher she had in mind. When we arrived at the Pingnan School, Vicky and I were impressed to see an electronic sign greeting us as honored guests. This was followed by a warm welcome from the elegantly clad and coiffed headmistress (I begin to see why they say that Shanghai is the New York City of China), Zhang Xiao Juan (no relation to the teacher).

After a quick chat, with Vicky translating for Ms. Zhang and me, we were ushered down to the classroom where the lesson was already underway. I could hear the strains of “Old MacDonald Had a Farm” wafting up the stairwell as Vicky, the headmistress, and several other teachers hurried in to the classroom to take our seats in the back of the room.

About 25 freshly scrubbed, pink-cheeked fifth graders were singing lustily in English and acting out the moves of the animals who live on MacDonald’s farm. As we settled into our seats, the teacher told the children that today they’d be sharing some of the ideas they had recently been studying about animals. “First, let’s talk about our favorite animals,” she proposed in a soft, but clearly audible voice. “Who knows what my favorite animal is?”
“A monkey!” suggested a young boy in the front row of seats. “You really love monkeys, don’t you?” responded Ms. Zhang warmly, and indeed this kid proposed “monkey” as the answer to nearly every question she posed during the 40 minute class. “But, no, that’s not my favorite.”
“A tiger!” said another boy. “No, I’m afraid of tigers.”
“A turtle!” said another student when Ms. Zhang called on her waving hand. “Yes,” said Ms. Zhang, as she opened a PowerPoint slide showing a photo of two turtles. “These are my two pet turtles. They have a lovely painted pattern on their shells, as you see. I have these two big turtles and…two small turtles,” clicking the slide to add the photo of her smaller pets. She talked about what she fed the turtles and then she asked, “What do you think the turtles are doing while I’m here at school?”
“They’re sleeping,” called out a kid when she acknowledged his raised hand.
“Yes, that right because now it is winter. In winter it’s (she paused) ‘very cold’ (called out several excited students), yes, and what do turtles do during the winter? They hibernate (she enunciated this word with emphasis, and the children repeated it as she pronounced it three more times and defined it for them.)

Then Ms. Zhang, showed a slide with the question, “What is your favorite animal?” and several categories: appearance, food, habits, etc. “Now turn to your neighbor and use these categories to talk about YOUR favorite animal,” she told the class.

Students were seated in five rows of paired desks and they quickly dived into a lively conversation with their partner. As the children exchanged their ideas in English, Ms. Zhang stopped at various desks to hear how students were talking, to prompt, correct, or stimulate, and (I learned later) to make mental notes about each student’s work.

In a few minutes, she convened the whole class again by clapping her hands softly, and began the next section of the lesson. A similar sequence ensued for each section. Ms. Zhang started the conversation with the whole class by introducing a question, such as “What are China’s unique animals?”, “How are animals involved in the Beijing Olympics?” (turns out that the slogan for the Olympics sounds like the names of five little creatures, including several animals. Later, I saw their pictures on posters all over Beijing.), “What do we get from animals?”, “What endangers animals in China?”, or “What do you want to do to help animals?”. After posing the question, Ms. Zhang led the whole class in opening out some ideas about the question through a conversation that included many open-ended questions, accompanied by stimulating images and phrases on one or more slides. She called on students who raised their hands, but so many wanted to speak that she easily managed to call on every student several times during the class.

Once the conversation about the topic warmed up with the whole class, she invited students to talk in pairs, with their neighbor or sometimes with whomever they wished. She roamed as students conversed in pairs and made her way to every student at some point during the class. After pairs had a chance to exchange ideas, she would reconvene the whole class, invite individual students to share responses, and pull together the group’s ideas, using pre-prepared PowerPoint slides with pictures and phrases that responded to the question under discussion. What endangers animals?—-pollution, not enough trees, less and less food, poachers, etc.

Clearly, the students had heard some of these concepts before. I learned later that they had all done some research in preparation for this lesson. Ms. Zhang had shared the set of questions with them, and collected some magazines and books about animals from the school library. She also made a list of websites that the students could consult if they had access to the Internet at home or during school. She encouraged them to do some research and to collect their thoughts before this class. Some students had made notes and read their answers to the questions during the class. Most spoke their answers spontaneously, although they had obviously done some thinking in advance.

For the final section of the class, Ms. Zhang started a conversation about what the students could do to help animals. Then she asked each student to write his or her answer on a piece of paper, and invited them to draw a picture about their answer, if they wished. I watched as kids around the room scratched their heads and planned their sentences. Then they wrote their answers, some with fat markers and big printed letters, others with pencils or pens in neat cursive, and a few with detailed drawings to accompany a few written words.

Suddenly, I realized that a student was waving his paper in front of me and wanting to share his work. “I want to be a zoo keeper and take care of animals,” he said eagerly, pointing to these words on his page. “That’s a good idea. Have you been to a zoo?” I asked. “Yes, I’ve been to the zoo in Shanghai,” he said. “It’s a good zoo and you should visit it.” Soon there was a wiggling line of students in front of me and each one wanted to show and tell his or her answer to the question. I was enchanted by their eager faces and their bold forays into speaking this foreign language with a stranger. I asked each one a question to extend our conversation and nearly every one was able to understand and respond to me. A few were shy or didn’t understand my question, and Ms. Zhang gently helped them into a response.

All too soon, time was up, and Ms. Zhang told the students to put their materials away because the class was over. “Good-bye!” they began to chime as they waved to me with huge smiles. “Welcome to Shanghai!,” “Would you like to see my stuffed animal?,” “I hope you visit the zoo.” “Good-bye!”

Impact of TfU and WIDE World:

I haven’t seen a better demonstration of Teaching for Understanding principles in action and I said so when the teacher, the headmistress, and the other English teachers convened in the conference room a few minutes later. But first, I was honored with a gift of two ceramic pieces made by one of the students at the school, to welcome me and to emphasize how much the arts are part of learning at this school. After offering a quick summary of the many aspects of the class that impressed me, I asked the teacher Ms. Zhang to talk about how this lesson was different from what she might have done before she took the TfU 1 course from WIDE World.
Ms. Zhang was prompt and precise with her answers. I have not yet transcribed the video and audio recordings I made, so what follows are paraphrases of her comments:
“I asked the students what they wanted to study in English class: festivals, families, animals. They selected animals and I was happy to build the unit around their interests. I don’t believe I would have invited them to pick the topic before I learned about the importance of connecting a generative topic to the students’ experience.”
“Also, I shifted my goals from just learning to understanding. Before, I might have focused just on correct vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, and spelling. But after learning about understanding goals, I realized that it was also important for students to be able to speak fluently in conversation and to write vividly about ideas that interested them. So I became clearer about my understanding goals.”
“I also shifted my approach to assessment. Before, I would usually assess students by giving them a test at the end of a unit. Now, I realize that I can use formative assessments and informal observations during a lesson, to gauge what students are understanding.”

With the others around the table, we talked about what helps teachers carry out these kinds of practices in their classrooms. One of the other visitors, a teacher from a different school who also completed the TfU1 course, talked about how she has worked with other English teachers at her school. She said that she had planned a lesson about festivals during her work with WIDE. She convened the other English teachers and they all decided that they could each plan a unit about a festival for their classes of different grade levels. They would each focus on a different festival and plan lessons that were suited to their students’ interests and different degrees of proficiency with English. All the English teachers, both at her school and at Pingnan School, are free at the same time for two hours each week. This gives them a common time to plan and discuss their lessons. The other English teachers from Pingnan said they’d like to work with Ms. Zhang on designing lessons that looked more like they one they had just observed her teach.

Leading for Understanding:

Then we all went to the school lunch room to share a tasty lunch and more conversation. Several people had mentioned what a superb leader the headmistress was. In front of her, I asked the teachers what made her such a good leader. They smiled warmly and one said, “She is strict and she is nice.” Strict and nice, the others agreed. This reminds me of Ron Ferguson’s research on school cultures that support high performance for minority students: the key ingredients are high expectations coupled with plenty of support. Both are needed; neither one by itself is enough. The headmistress certainly has high expectations. Indeed, she pointed out her motto for the school on her card, “Let’s do it right at first time.” That does not mean that teachers should be afraid to try something new. But they should plan it carefully so that even the first try is a good one and they don’t waste resources, Headmistress Zhang explained through the interpreter. She also provides plenty of support and encouragement to all her teachers. She is wise about how she allocates her allotted school budget. I exclaimed about how pretty the building is and several people noted that the head mistress is largely responsible. She designed many of the handsome architectural elements. And she manages the budget so that the school has money to pay for some beauty, in addition to its high quality education program.

At this point, the headmistress indicated that she had something to say. My translator Vicky interpreted her words. “I want to take this WIDE World course myself so that I will know better how to support my teachers. And I will pay for all these teachers to take the course.” This last remark generated a buzz of excitement and the teachers’ faces broke into smiles of amazement. “I want our school to become a model of Teaching for Understanding for Shanghai,” concluded headmistress Zhang Xio Juan.

Then we took a brief tour of the school grounds. I learned that school was not in session this day, because students had already begun their month-long vacation around the Chinese New Year. Ms. Zhang had asked her fifth graders to come into school for that one period just so that I could see a lesson—and they had all shown up for this purpose! The teachers and headmistress showed me around the handsome school yard, designed by the headmistress herself, with lovely plantings and architectural elements that provide seating while inviting students to practice their music with the little flutes that every student learns to play. The overall effect was of an esthetic, orderly, focused learning environment where people work hard, have fun, and support one another joyfully.

Who could ask for more? I couldn’t have been more impressed by the lesson, the collegiality, or the leadership. If WIDE World is able to spread a common language that encourages and supports fine educators like these, and provides a way for them to articulate and share their good work with others, then we should feel thoroughly pleased.

Examples of teaching for understanding in India


I can’t describe all the examples I saw of wonderful educational projects at the Aditi, Srishti, and Drishya schools in Bangalore. So, I will describe a few of them that seem particularly emblematic of the way these schools blend ancient traditional crafts and history with contemporary design, academic learning with the arts, and school work with efforts to improve the community. Often these projects result in artifacts and/or performances that directly enrich both the school and the larger community.

Unfortunately, the Aditi School was closed on the Monday when I first visited, due to a disturbance in a neighborhood of Bangalore. As happens with some frequency around India, tensions between Hindus and Muslims erupts when some small incident is interpreted as an insult and sets off the ever-present kindling caused by poverty and crowding in some urban neighborhoods. I have the impression, partly from reading Amartya Sen’s fascinating book called “The Argumentative Indian” that some political parties try to spark this kindling to gain power through people’s fears. Some rock-throwing incident on Sunday had led to looting and the police who eventually arrived to quell the violence caused additional destruction as they tried to calm the crowd. A curfew was imposed on the area which lasted until 7AM on Monday. The principal of Aditi didn’t want to risk sending school buses into the neighborhood to collect children nor did he feel confident that all would be calm by Monday afternoon when children needed to return home. So, in the wee hours of Monday morning, he canceled school for the day—the equivalent of a “snow day” in New England. I heard that many children were happy for the unexpected vacation, but I was disappointed to miss seeing the school in action. Instead, I walked around the school with Geetha and the principal Satish Jayarajan and heard about its philosophy, programs, and projects.

The school was designed by a team of young architects, so inexperienced that their designs had to be reviewed and approved by senior architects. Perhaps their youth gave them fresh ideas and helped them remember what kids want to experience at school. The school is beautifully designed for a climate that is balmy for most of the year. It is built from high-quality local materials like stone and tile. It is open so that classrooms branch off of handsomely landscaped courtyards with nooks of varying sizes where groups gather to study, eat, or practice performances. Many of the walls in these open corridors and courtyards are decorated with murals and projects that classes of students have made.

One of thse projects generated a gorgeous mosaic floor depicting a complex scene of dinosaurs roaming the earth. It was designed by young Aditi students, and then built in collaboration with college-aged design students from the neighboring Srishti School (more about that school later). All of the work was coordinated and guided by one of the Aditi teachers. Some of the materials for the mosaic were purchased, but many of the stones were collected by students from the surrounding neighborhoods, including scraps from nearby potteries and stone-cutting factories and bits from along the road. Hallmarks of this project that I saw recurring in many other projects in these schools are: recycling of materials, integration of art with other academic subjects, and collaboration of students and teachers across grade levels, all in the service of creating a product that expresses and sustains the community spirit.

Late one afternoon, I visited the Drishya classrooms, housed next to part of the campus for Srishti school. These are resource classrooms where children from the slums of Bangalore come for special instruction that enriches the experience they have in the Drishya school located inside the slum. On this afternoon, the students—a group of about a dozen 10-12 year olds—were practicing their culminating performance for an extensive project. The performance is a public service radio program to be broadcast on low-tech radios that will be set up throughout the slum neighborhood. As their teacher passed the microphone around, each child made a short speech in Kannada, their local language, about how to protect animals. The microphone was connected to a test radio and we could hear their sturdy voices reproduced on the speaker. Although I don’t know one word of Kannada, the strength and commitment in each child’s voice was moving. I learned later that the students, some of whom are homeless, had cared for a litter of abandoned puppies as part of their study and had visited a shelter for homeless animals. Part of their broadcast includes information about how to contact this animal shelter. After this practice run, the teachers, with assistance from Shristi students and faculty, will help students set up radios throughout the slum. They hope their broadcast will be the first in a series that eventually enables the students to run their own local radio station for the slum.

This unit on animals was part of a major project called “Earth is Just Right for Me” that links many units taught at different grade levels across the Drishya School. The overarching theme of these units is based on Goldilocks’ refrain about a bowl of porridge, a chair, and a bed that were just right for her. Drishya children study planet Earth in comparison with Mars and Venus and learn about oxygen levels and respiration systems of plants and animals on Earth. For some students, this leads to investigations into lungs and factors that impede healthy lungs, including pollution and smoking. They have launched an anti-smoking campaign among their families and neighbors. Other classes have studied metamorphosis in butterflies and moths. They have created a butterfly garden at the school so that they can gather pupae and watch when the butterflies emerge. Their butterfly garden is fertilized by compost generated in handsome pots where food scraps gradually are transformed into rich humus. These pots are part of a project developed by one of the founding faculty of Shristi School, Poonam Bir Kasturi. She designed the pots and set up a business in Bangalore called Daily Dump (www.dailydump.org) which distributes the pots. The business plan is available to be replicated in other communities, using their own local materials and designs.

In all these projects, I see extensive enactments of the principles of Teaching for Understanding. Topics are richly generative, goals are clear and ambitious, performances are wonderfully varied and focused on development of understanding. Many teachers involve students in conducting assessments of their own and peer’s work. Although the Teaching for Understanding framework is not explicitly used by many teachers, I learned a great deal about how to enact its principles from visiting these schools.

For those who are interested in learning more about Geetha Narayanan and her ideas, you might check out the comment she added to my previous note about networked learning. Let me take this occasion to invite you to add a comment to any posts in this blog. My hope is that it will serve to connect people who are interested in applications of TfU and WIDE World around the world.

Friday, February 2, 2007

Networked Learning



When I was preparing to take this trip, I often had a recurring dream. It was more a dream about feelings than specific images or activities, but it was always about trying to make connections among a range of disparate and distant bits. In the dream, I was trying to link people and projects to achieve a goal that none of us could achieve alone. The goal was not entirely clear and the bits to be connected weren't clear either. The dream made me feel excited about possibilities, but uncertain about the nature of the endeavor, and intimidated by its scale. I haven't had the dream since I began this journey, but I feel I am living it.

The first night I arrived in Bangalore, I was taken to a faculty apartment where my friend Geetha Narayanan had arranged for me to stay. Geetha is a visionary educator, deeply informed by wide-ranging reading about learning, philosophy, new media, social transformation, and the arts. She has a talent for making alliances, luring talented people into working with her, and gathering resources of all kinds to build lasting institutions. Geetha is the co-founder of several schools: Aditi International School, the Srishti School of Art Design and Technology, and the Drishya School for poor children, all in Bangalore. Along with some other powerful women, she formed Aditi, a primary-secondary school, when the other international schools in Bangalore refused to admit Indian children. The school integrates the arts while developing students’ understanding of a high level academic curriculum. Srishti is a 3-year college housed next door to Aditi, where students learn various aspects of design that integrates new technologies through conducting projects that contribute to learning and development of communities. Recently, Srishti expanded to include an additional nearby campus and part of this new campus is a resource center for the Drishya school. Geetha co-founded Drishya in order to provide high quality education, of the sort offered at Aditi and Srishti to relatively privileged students, to children who live in the slums of Bangalore.

I began to learn about the culture and vision of these schools on my first night in Bangalore when one of the Srishti faculty invited me to join a small party of other faculty members at her house. Like most Srishti faculty, Radha Chandrashakaran is a practicing artist. She walked me around her house to show me some of her paintings--wonderful images that combine tribal and ritual images in dreamlike collages. Several of her paintings are inspired by Kolams. These are designs that Indian woman create at the entrance to their houses every morning. They create them by sifting rice powder through their fingers. The rice is an offering to the gods and to the little animals that eat it. The design is supposed to absorb negative energy from those who step on it so they bring only positive energy into the house. Radha learned to make the Kolam while sitting with her grandmother. Little Radha was bored watching her grandmother create the designs, "So my grandmother bribed me, by telling me stories--about Indian myths,” Radha tells me. She loved the stories then, but now she believes that learning about these designs set her on her path as an artist whose research focuses on tribal women’s art. See more of Radha's work on her website Radartist.

As I talked with Geetha and her colleagues, I began to appreciate what Geetha calls “slow learning.” Although many of these teachers are advocates of new technologies and fluent multi-media artists, they are concerned about the emphasis in technologized societies on acquiring and transmitting information as fast as possible. Another veteran teacher at these schools Tara Kini told me about the gurukul tradition of learning in India, in which expert gurus gradually develop their novices over a period of years. The novice lives with the guru and waits on him while observing, practicing, and being coached sometimes for as much as ten years. Slow learning, like slow cooking, is as much about the process as the product and it takes place through many rounds of hand-making, with modeling and feedback provided by a master.

I saw many examples of this kind of slow learning at all three of these schools in Bangalore. I hope to write about some more examples in another post. For now, just to round out this note about networked learning, I will mention that the image at the beginning of this note is from a Kolam outside the Drishya school. It was made by the young students there. I also saw their plans for this design in the room where they study patterns and geometry. Here they mapped out the design on graph paper, tracking the symmetries and recurring patterns that they then transferred to the beautiful Kolam on the threshold. This is only one of many examples of lessons that link the past to the future, ritual to contemporary design, school to community, arts with academics, practicing artists and scholars with school children. I am beginning to see how networks can be formed that connect poverty with privilege in mutually beneficial relationships and that join educators with common interests around the world.