When I was preparing to take this trip, I often had a recurring dream. It was more a dream about feelings than specific images or activities, but it was always about trying to make connections among a range of disparate and distant bits. In the dream, I was trying to link people and projects to achieve a goal that none of us could achieve alone. The goal was not entirely clear and the bits to be connected weren't clear either. The dream made me feel excited about possibilities, but uncertain about the nature of the endeavor, and intimidated by its scale. I haven't had the dream since I began this journey, but I feel I am living it.
The first night I arrived in Bangalore, I was taken to a faculty apartment where my friend Geetha Narayanan had arranged for me to stay. Geetha is a visionary educator, deeply informed by wide-ranging reading about learning, philosophy, new media, social transformation, and the arts. She has a talent for making alliances, luring talented people into working with her, and gathering resources of all kinds to build lasting institutions. Geetha is the co-founder of several schools: Aditi International School, the Srishti School of Art Design and Technology, and the Drishya School for poor children, all in Bangalore. Along with some other powerful women, she formed Aditi, a primary-secondary school, when the other international schools in Bangalore refused to admit Indian children. The school integrates the arts while developing students’ understanding of a high level academic curriculum. Srishti is a 3-year college housed next door to Aditi, where students learn various aspects of design that integrates new technologies through conducting projects that contribute to learning and development of communities. Recently, Srishti expanded to include an additional nearby campus and part of this new campus is a resource center for the Drishya school. Geetha co-founded Drishya in order to provide high quality education, of the sort offered at Aditi and Srishti to relatively privileged students, to children who live in the slums of Bangalore.
I began to learn about the culture and vision of these schools on my first night in Bangalore when one of the Srishti faculty invited me to join a small party of other faculty members at her house. Like most Srishti faculty, Radha Chandrashakaran is a practicing artist. She walked me around her house to show me some of her paintings--wonderful images that combine tribal and ritual images in dreamlike collages. Several of her paintings are inspired by Kolams.
As I talked with Geetha and her colleagues, I began to appreciate what Geetha calls “slow learning.” Although many of these teachers are advocates of new technologies and fluent multi-media artists, they are concerned about the emphasis in technologized societies on acquiring and transmitting information as fast as possible. Another veteran teacher at these schools Tara Kini told me about the gurukul tradition of learning in India, in which expert gurus gradually develop their novices over a period of years. The novice lives with the guru and waits on him while observing, practicing, and being coached sometimes for as much as ten years. Slow learning, like slow cooking, is as much about the process as the product and it takes place through many rounds of hand-making, with modeling and feedback provided by a master.
I saw many examples of this kind of slow learning at all three of these schools in Bangalore. I hope to write about some more examples in another post. For now, just to round out this note about networked learning, I will mention that the image at the beginning of this note is from a Kolam outside the Drishya school. It was made by the young students there. I also saw their plans for this design in the room where they study patterns and geometry. Here they mapped out the design on graph paper, tracking the symmetries and recurring patterns that they then transferred to the beautiful Kolam on the threshold. This is only one of many examples of lessons that link the past to the future, ritual to contemporary design, school to community, arts with academics, practicing artists and scholars with school children. I am beginning to see how networks can be formed that connect poverty with privilege in mutually beneficial relationships and that join educators with common interests around the world.
5 comments:
Hey Stone,
Great to read your blog! I'll follow when I can; and wonder - is slow learning like an "apprenticeship" model? Or different?
Well, I should say that I'm not certain of all the connotations that "slow learning" has for Geetha. So I'm beginning to develop my own connotations for the term. It seems to me that "slow learning" might be a more general category of which apprenticeship learning, or the gurukul tradition are more specific forms. The important characteristic of "slow learning" is that it does not follow the common pattern, associated with technology-mediated learning, of transmitting digits to acquire knowledge as fast as possible. Instead, it includes time for interactions among people that include learning and expression through "multiple intelligences." More generally, the term reminds us that deep learning--when the goal is not just to change a mind, but to modify performance and maybe transform the person--takes time.
Hope that helps,
stone
Dear Stone,
It's wonderful to get these verbal snapshots of your own expansive learning! Thanks very much for your clarity while in the midst and the compelling images you use to illuminate your path for your readers. It's fascinating to go from the instant synapse implied by what I usually think of as "networked" learning to the sociocultural steppes of the different kinds of networks across different kinds of timescales that you describe in "slow learning". This made me think of a slow learning insight Nancy & I had recently about renovating our kitchen. Our kitchen doesn't have a (mechanical) dishwasher, and this was one of the big reasons we wanted to renovate. But then we started seeing that all kinds of interactions happen around washing dishes that wouldn't otherwise have happened: talking politics with our daughters, singing, stupid jokes... There's something about having your hands busy with a task that doesn't take much mental effort that allows you to have different kinds of interactions. So now when visiting family wonders why we hold to the old ways, we can just invite them into the sacred interactional space of "slow dishwashing"! :)
Related to your reply to david1 above, it seems from your wonderful anecdote about rice flour patterns on the threshold and my note about dishwashing that slow learning is definitively mediated by technologies, just not the digital technologies we think of when we hear the word "technology." But the sponge, dishsoap, drying rack, towel all play their part in mediating certain kinds of interaction. In this instance the technology is ancillary to whatever kinds of tacit learning that might be going on in parent-child interaction. Nonetheless these technologies create the surround within which such interaction exists (and wouldn't otherwise exist).
I agree with David e.s that slow learning is mediated by new technologies and this is an important point to remember.
My real concern has been to move away from a pedagogy that supports an education for change or what is often described as a transmissive form of learning to a pedagogy that supports education as change. The first tends to be imposed on the learner and values third person experiences over the first.The second is transformational at two levels- the mind and the body and is inherently participative and enactive in its way of creating deep learning. Here primary experience in the first person is the key to change at unified level of mind-body-spirit. What I have been aspiring to do over the years is to find ways of bringing a sense of "wholeness" into learning spaces and learning experiences- in ways that values culture, integrates context and which builds both cognitive architecture and substantive freedoms in all learners. Substantive Freedoms is a word drawn from the work of Amartya Sen titled Development as Freedom. In this book he lists freedoms that people need in order to enjoy a better quality of life.
Dear colleagues,
What a joy to find some of my favorite people in direct contact with one another here. Thanks to David Z, David ES, and Geetha for posting.
Geetha, I appreciate your noting the connection of "wholeness" to slow learning. As you say, new technologies, not just traditional technologies, may contribute to such learning so long as their use promotes deep connection-making and the growth of freedom.
So, David ES and his family may have decided that an automatic dishwasher would not increase meaningful learning and relationships in their family. But I would say that this blog appears to be helping me digest, connect, and extend my "slow learning" in ways that would not be possible or likely without it. The multi-media, web-based facilities that enable me to post, and the comment facilities that invite others into the conversation, are not matched by other technologies.
So, the issue is not which technologies can support slow learning, but how and why they are integrated into the learning process.
best to you all,
stone
Post a Comment